On 8/23/14, 6:45 PM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
On 8/23/14, 6:13 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Roelofs <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This is a fail test... could it be that the missing return is actually part
of the behavior being checked by this test?
Unless its testing a compilation failure no, and as it did compile that seems
Really? Check again...
unlikely.
You can test for the behavior of falling off the end of a function without a
return -- that behavior is undefined, so its impossible to write a test against.
Oh, right.
Wait a second, this test is *supposed* to be a compile failure, but not for the
reason I originally thought. It's testing that unique_ptr requires the deleter
have a public default constructor. Because it fails to compile, '-Wall -Wextra
-pedantic -Werror' won't help us here :(
Cheers,
Jon
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
