Eric Fiselier <[email protected]> writes: > That looks doable. I'll look into it. Thanks. > Can you point me to some documentation on `-verify`?
This should help: http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1VerifyDiagnosticConsumer.html#details > /Eric > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Justin Bogner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Eric Fiselier <[email protected]> writes: > > I'm not opposed to the change but using Filecheck really hurts our > ability to > > test standalone. > > Also, we don't have that many compilation failures tests. I'm not sure > how > > badly this change is needed. > > Using clang -verify avoids that issue, but there's still the matter of > having to update almost 300 tests to use it. > > Here's a quick example of hackily adding a verify flag instead of > checking for rc 1 in the lit.cfg and updating the test under discussion: _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
