>
> > This seems wrong to me.
> >
> > Did you mean to write getLocEnd() instead? (Under the assumption that
> > identifier should comes last in class type)
>
This was done so that 'friend struct A' and 'friend A' (C++11) have
different location since former is also a forward declaration. Does that
make sense or have I misunderstood your question?
It is useful to know that currently for:
>
> template <class U> class C {
> template<class T> friend struct A<T>::B;
> };
>
Not really sure what A is supposed to be here but this code is
ill-formed: explicit specialization of non-template struct 'A'
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
