Il 30/08/2014 03:02, Nikola Smiljanic ha scritto:
> > This seems wrong to me.
> >
> > Did you mean to write getLocEnd() instead? (Under the assumption that
> > identifier should comes last in class type)
>
>
> This was done so that 'friend struct A' and 'friend A' (C++11) have
> different location since former is also a forward declaration. Does that
> make sense or have I misunderstood your question?
AFAIK this is not correct: getLocation() should always return the
location of identifier token.
>
> It is useful to know that currently for:
>
> template <class U> class C {
> template<class T> friend struct A<T>::B;
> };
>
>
> Not really sure what A is supposed to be here but this code is
> ill-formed: explicit specialization of non-template struct 'A'
This was only the part containing shown location, full code is
template <class T> struct A
{
struct B { };
};
template <class U> class C {
template <class T> friend struct A<T>::B;
};
--
Abramo Bagnara
BUGSENG srl - http://bugseng.com
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
