I added support for c-arcmt-test and committed, thanks! On 5 November 2014 09:00, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]> wrote: > It's better. Did you consider other libclang.so's users, c-arcmt-test > and libclangTests? > I think you may commit them if they would work for you. I don't think > they would break anything. > > 2014-11-05 3:58 GMT+09:00 Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]>: >> What about the attached patches adding and using LLVM_BUILD_STATIC? >> >> >> >> On 4 November 2014 09:08, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Rafael, >>> >>> I suppose LIBCLANG_BUILD_STATIC is an option to build *extra* libclang.a. >>> Then I'd like to use libclang.so regardless of LIBCLANG_BUILD_STATIC. >>> FYI, I am enabling LIBCLANG_BUILD_STATIC in my local build tree. >>> >>> I suggest options; >>> >>> - Change "libclang and libclang_static" <=> "libclang_shared and >>> libclang" according to CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS (to scan it). >>> - Introduce another option like LLVM_BUILD_STATIC. >>> With this, do you think libclang.so could be built with explicit >>> target? (like "ninja libclang_shared") >>> >>> 2014-11-04 0:22 GMT+09:00 Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]>: >>>> A build with -static currently fails when trying to link c-index-test. >>>> The attached patch fixes it. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Rafael
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
