Ping. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Something like this? > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I see lots of calls to LookupQualifiedName and only a few of them check >> if they should call LookupInSuper. >> >> Many users of LookupQualifiedName are looking up thinks like >> SomeClass::operator=, so they don't have a CXXScopeSpec. Maybe we should >> add a CXXScopeSpec overload to LookupQualifiedName to make it easier for >> callers to do the right thing? >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Ping >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It seems that there's one more place where we need to call >>>> LookupInSuper. I've modified the relevant tests to catch this by having >>>> different signature for the method and making sure the right one is called. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
