Yeah, looks good to me. On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can I commit this Reid? > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ping. >> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Something like this? >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I see lots of calls to LookupQualifiedName and only a few of them check >>>> if they should call LookupInSuper. >>>> >>>> Many users of LookupQualifiedName are looking up thinks like >>>> SomeClass::operator=, so they don't have a CXXScopeSpec. Maybe we should >>>> add a CXXScopeSpec overload to LookupQualifiedName to make it easier for >>>> callers to do the right thing? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ping >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It seems that there's one more place where we need to call >>>>>> LookupInSuper. I've modified the relevant tests to catch this by having >>>>>> different signature for the method and making sure the right one is >>>>>> called. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
