On 26 January 2015 at 15:49, Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote: > Anything can be justified on those grounds (and sometimes is, not just > by NetBSD), but using it to *add* legacy is extremely sketchy.
I agree we should not bend to all legacy arguments, you know I had my share of rants against that, but there are some cases that are harder to change, especially around how distros are organised. I'm not an expert on BSD, so I don't have a strong opinion either way. > In particular I think some change *should* be in the generic > toolchain. My tests indicate that GCC's behaviour is to pass --be8 by > default for v7 (& v6m), not for v5, and to require -Wl,--be in the > middle. This is confusing... Are you proposing we do the same? cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
