On 4 February 2015 at 14:20, Oliver Stannard <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks to me as if the main point of the test is checking the details of > the memcpy call inside f, so that loosening the CHECK-LABEL to permit f to > return i64 should not defeat the test's actual purpose?
+1 --renato _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
