================
Comment at: include/tuple:514
@@ -513,2 +513,3 @@
template <bool _Dummy = true, class _Up = typename enable_if<
+ __all<__dependent_type<is_default_constructible<_Tp>,
_Dummy>::value...>::value
----------------
Nitpick, no need to name `_Up` here.
================
Comment at: test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/default.pass.cpp:39
@@ +38,3 @@
+ IllFormedDefaultImp(T x) : value(x) {}
+ constexpr IllFormedDefaultImp() {}
+ T value;
----------------
Could this constructor be made ill-formed in a more obvious way? For instance,
would a `static_assert` dependent on `T` achieve the same effect?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7569
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
