Accepting. I think this is a candidate for post commit review.
================
Comment at: include/type_traits:2649-2652
@@ -2648,1 +2648,6 @@
+template <class _Tp, bool>
+struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY __dependent_is_default_constructible
+ : public is_default_constructible<_Tp>
+ {};
+
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> Is it worth generalizing / simpilfying this:
>
> template <class _Tp, bool> struct __dependent : public _Tp {};
>
> (Usage: `__dependent<is_default_constructible<_Tp>, Dummy>::value`)
Probably.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7569
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
