Thank you for the feedback. I think I should have seen the first problem in advance. I find the second one more subtle. Both should be fixed in r229552. I am not absolutely happy with the solution: checking for type equality modulo references. It would be better to check if appropriate type conversions exists, but I did not find a nice way to do it. What is your opinion?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7246 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
