In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7246#124990, @xazax.hun wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback. I think I should have seen the first problem in > advance. I find the second one more subtle. Both should be fixed in r229552. > I am not absolutely happy with the solution: checking for type equality > modulo references. It would be better to check if appropriate type > conversions exists, but I did not find a nice way to do it. What is your > opinion? I don't know if a better solution exists. The fix looks fine. Thanks! http://reviews.llvm.org/D7246 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
