On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Author: ddunbar
> Date: Wed Jul 21 17:09:09 2010
> New Revision: 109044
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=109044&view=rev
> Log:
> tests: XFAIL this test on win32, someone else can hunt this one down.
If you're going to XFAIL it (which is fine by me), could you revert r109029 as
well? We got better testing before r109029.
- Doug
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c?rev=109044&r1=109043&r2=109044&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c Wed Jul 21 17:09:09 2010
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>
> // RUN: %clang_cc1 -print-preamble %s > %t
> // RUN: FileCheck < %t %s
> +// XFAIL: win32
>
> // CHECK: // Preamble detection test: see below for comments and test
> commands.
> // CHECK-NEXT: //
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits