On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> Author: ddunbar >> Date: Wed Jul 21 17:09:09 2010 >> New Revision: 109044 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=109044&view=rev >> Log: >> tests: XFAIL this test on win32, someone else can hunt this one down. > > If you're going to XFAIL it (which is fine by me), could you revert r109029 > as well? We got better testing before r109029.
Is there a specific case you are worried about, and can I fix the FileCheck version to cover that case instead? - Daniel > - Doug > >> Modified: >> cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c >> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c?rev=109044&r1=109043&r2=109044&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c Wed Jul 21 17:09:09 2010 >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ >> >> // RUN: %clang_cc1 -print-preamble %s > %t >> // RUN: FileCheck < %t %s >> +// XFAIL: win32 >> >> // CHECK: // Preamble detection test: see below for comments and test >> commands. >> // CHECK-NEXT: // >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
