On 08/14/2010 07:34 PM, Charles Davis wrote: > On 8/14/10 1:55 PM, John McCall wrote: >> This seems fine, though yeah, I guess I'd prefer that you checked it in with >> the MS layout code. > Here's a version that includes some MS-specific code. It handles the > case where a class has both a virtual method and a virtual base (in such > cases, VC would give it two virtual pointers).
Does every member function need to be virtual? A lot of those seem like overriding them is possibly a bad idea, and in any case it's not very useful to make them virtual if we aren't overriding them. Sean _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
