On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Jason Haslam wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Jason Haslam wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Why was this patch reverted? Using the CMake dependency tracking for
>>> libraries makes it a lot easier to integrate clang into other CMake-based
>>> build systems. If there's something that can be done to fix the patch I'd
>>> be willing to work on it.
>>
>> The dependencies are still available in LLVMLibDeps.cmake, which is to be
>> semi-automatically updated as library dependencies change. So CMake already
>> has all of the dependencies; they're just not explicit in each
>> CMakeLists.txt.
>
> Is there something similar for Clang? For example, I'm trying to get a list
> of libraries (in correct order for some linkers) that are needed to link
> clangAST. For now we're just deriving the list through trial-and-error, but
> seeing these checkins gave me hope that there might be an easier way.
Clang has explicit dependencies in the CMakeLists.txt. I'm hoping we'll get a
ClangLibDeps.cmake, maintained the same was as LLVMLibDeps.cmake.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits