On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Jason Haslam wrote: > >> On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: >> >>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Jason Haslam wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Why was this patch reverted? Using the CMake dependency tracking for >>>> libraries makes it a lot easier to integrate clang into other CMake-based >>>> build systems. If there's something that can be done to fix the patch I'd >>>> be willing to work on it. >>> >>> The dependencies are still available in LLVMLibDeps.cmake, which is to be >>> semi-automatically updated as library dependencies change. So CMake already >>> has all of the dependencies; they're just not explicit in each >>> CMakeLists.txt. >> >> Is there something similar for Clang? For example, I'm trying to get a list >> of libraries (in correct order for some linkers) that are needed to link >> clangAST. For now we're just deriving the list through trial-and-error, but >> seeing these checkins gave me hope that there might be an easier way. > > Clang has explicit dependencies in the CMakeLists.txt. I'm hoping we'll get a > ClangLibDeps.cmake, maintained the same was as LLVMLibDeps.cmake. > > - Doug
Okay, fair enough. Thanks! Jason _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
