On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Oops, I was just going through my backlog and thought this was ok (but
> don't know much about the XML dumping) and applied it in r115041.
>
> Should I take it out again Doug?
It's not harmful, so it's okay if it stays in. Hopefully, to be replaced with
what I described below :)
- Doug
> - Daniel
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Martin Vejnár wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, the attached patch adds nested structures to the XML output. Only
>>> defined nested structures are added.
>>
>> Why? It seems like addSubNodes() for a RecordDecl should just visit all of
>> the nodes in the decls_begin()/decls_end(), printing everything (which will
>> include fields, member functions, static data members, etc.). Of course, it
>> could skip "implicit" declarations, so we don't have to see the
>> injected-class-name.
>>
>> With the restriction that only defined nested structures are added, we won't
>> see forward-declared structures like
>>
>> struct X {
>> struct Inner;
>> };
>>
>> - Doug
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
