Looks good, thanks! Committed as r116103.
- Doug
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:26 AM, Martin Vejnár wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:49:44 -0700, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> It's not harmful, so it's okay if it stays in. Hopefully, to be replaced
>> with what I described below :)
>
> Yes, using decls_begin/decls_end is the way to go, I don't know what I was
> thinking. :) The new patch is attached.
>
>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>>> It seems like addSubNodes() for a RecordDecl should just visit all
>>>> of the nodes in the decls_begin()/decls_end(), printing everything
>>>> (which will include fields, member functions, static data members,
>>>> etc.). Of course, it could skip "implicit" declarations, so we don't
>>>> have to see the injected-class-name.
> --
> Martin
> <all_nested_decls_xml.patch>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
