On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Il 24/01/2011 02:52, Anders Carlsson ha scritto: >> >> On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Nico Weber wrote: >> >>> Why? Is the plan to reimplement this in some other way? >> >> >> The attributes have been replaced with keywords specified in >> http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3206.htm >> >> clang already supports the new keywords and allows them as an extension in >> C++98. > > Syntactic representation apart aren't that properties better stored > using clang attributes (i.e. Attr)? > > This seems appropriate to me both under a conceptual point of view and > both thinking about keyword location preserving issues.
I agree; I'm not sure why we had to make these non-Attrs just because they're not actually spelled as attributes anymore. John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
