On Jan 24, 2011, at 1:00 AM, John McCall wrote: > On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Abramo Bagnara wrote: >> Il 24/01/2011 02:52, Anders Carlsson ha scritto: >>> >>> On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Nico Weber wrote: >>> >>>> Why? Is the plan to reimplement this in some other way? >>> >>> >>> The attributes have been replaced with keywords specified in >>> http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2010/n3206.htm >>> >>> clang already supports the new keywords and allows them as an extension in >>> C++98. >> >> Syntactic representation apart aren't that properties better stored >> using clang attributes (i.e. Attr)? >> >> This seems appropriate to me both under a conceptual point of view and >> both thinking about keyword location preserving issues. > > I agree; I'm not sure why we had to make these non-Attrs just because > they're not actually spelled as attributes anymore. >
You're absolutely right. Fixed in 124122. - Anders _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
