On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > Mach-O patch looks good once the LLVM patches are committed.
Cool - I'll ping here again when those go through on the LLVM side. > The MSBitfields bit should be "important", not "benign", since having > -mms-bitfields when creating a PCH file but not when using that PCH file > would be rather catastrophic. Otherwise, looks good! OK - easily done. I didn't understand what was up there until looking at the warning messages. Thanks for the heads up. Updated patch file attached! -- Carl
mms-bitfields-1.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
