On Feb 1, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Carl Norum wrote: > >> >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: >>> Mach-O patch looks good once the LLVM patches are committed. >> >> Cool - I'll ping here again when those go through on the LLVM side. > > I've committed the Mach-O patch as r124660.
Thanks! >>> The MSBitfields bit should be "important", not "benign", since having >>> -mms-bitfields when creating a PCH file but not when using that PCH file >>> would be rather catastrophic. Otherwise, looks good! >> >> OK - easily done. I didn't understand what was up there until looking at >> the warning messages. Thanks for the heads up. Updated patch file attached! > > I've committed a slightly tweaked version of the MSBitfields patch in r124661. Right on! Those two checkins should get us to being able to successfully build EFI with LLVM & Clang. Thanks to you and to everyone else on the list who helped me get these changes committed! -- Carl _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
