On 4/27/11 10:21 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Charles Davis wrote: >> On 4/27/11 7:59 PM, Francois Pichet wrote: >>> Author: fpichet >>> Date: Wed Apr 27 20:59:37 2011 >>> New Revision: 130369 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=130369&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Upgrade Microsoft's __int8, __int16, __int32 and __int64 types from builtin >>> defines to real types. >> These actually need to be distinct types, if only so we can mangle them >> properly in the Microsoft Visual C++ ABI. (There's a TODO in >> lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp to that effect.) Right now, they're just >> aliases to the standard C types. > > Are these really distinct types, or are they just typedefs that happen to get > mangled distinctly? On second thought, it does seem redundant to have separate types for __int8 and char, etc. Semantically, there's really no difference. I just don't know how to detect if something was declared __int8 vs. char (or __int16 vs. short or __int32 vs int or __int64 vs long long), short of actually reading the source from the mangler.
Chip _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
