On 4/28/11 9:31 AM, John McCall wrote:
>
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
>> On 4/27/11 10:33 PM, John McCall wrote:
>>> Well, I think we already figured out that the MS mangler has to work with
>>> non-canonical types sometimes; this would just involve looking for
>>> particular TypedefTypes.
>>>
>>> But the first thing to figure out is whether they're different types.
>>> Judging from these changes they're built into the compiler somehow, so we
>>> need to check this programmatically, e.g., by whether this compiles or not:
>>>
>>> template <class A, class B> struct is_same {
>>> enum { value = -1 };
>>> };
>>> template <class A> struct is_same<A,B> {
>>> enum { value = 1 };
>>> };
>>> char myarray[is_same<__int16, short>::value];
>>
>> This compiles successfully with Visual C++ 8, so it looks like they
>> really aren't different types.
>
> Okay, thanks.
Not only that, but they aren't even mangled differently anymore. (The
only one that's mangled specially is __int64, and that's because it
predates 'long long' support.)
Chip
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
