On 01.05.2011, at 20:44, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > >> >> __has_extension should be a superset of __has_feature, so it should >> also include the C++ and C++0x features, as well as the Clang specific >> extensions. This can be done trivially by calling HasFeature from >> HasExtension. > > I agree. We should also have a __has_feature(has_extension) of course, and > the new goodness should be documented in the language extensions guide.
But __has_extension is not a standard feature! ;-) Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
