On May 1, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: >> >> I agree. We should also have a __has_feature(has_extension) of course, and >> the new goodness should be documented in the language extensions guide. >> > > Is this really needed ? We can already test for has_extension availability > using ifdef. > #ifndef __has_extension // Optional of course. > #define __has_extension(x) 0 // Compatibility with non-clang compilers. > #endif
Ah, great point. This is even better. Nope, not needed. -Chris
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
