On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:23 PM, John McCall wrote:
>>
>>> Author: rjmccall
>>> Date: Fri Jun 17 16:23:37 2011
>>> New Revision: 133295
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=133295&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> As a hopefully temporary workaround for a header mistake, treat
>>> __bridge_retain as a synonym for __bridge_retained.
>>
>> I really hate to say it, but… we should probably have a hard error + Fix-It
>> for this mis-spelling, but not emit the error if we're in a system header.
>> Otherwise, this bug is likely to leak into user code and we'll *never* get
>> rid of the wrong spelling.
>
> How about accepting it only in a system header ?
Isn't that what a hard error + Fix-It is? ;)
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
