On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote: > >> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:23 PM, John McCall wrote: >>> >>>> Author: rjmccall >>>> Date: Fri Jun 17 16:23:37 2011 >>>> New Revision: 133295 >>>> >>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=133295&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> As a hopefully temporary workaround for a header mistake, treat >>>> __bridge_retain as a synonym for __bridge_retained. >>> >>> I really hate to say it, but… we should probably have a hard error + Fix-It >>> for this mis-spelling, but not emit the error if we're in a system header. >>> Otherwise, this bug is likely to leak into user code and we'll *never* get >>> rid of the wrong spelling. >> >> How about accepting it only in a system header ? > > Isn't that what a hard error + Fix-It is? ;)
What.. I should learn to read before responding :-) > > - Doug _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
