> Agreed. Getting GCC to adopt any kind of changes can be non-trivial > though.
CC richi, he is the one that replied to my questions on IRC. In summary, I am OK with a patch that * Fixes the signature in builtins.def or * Removes it *if* you also email the gcc list and we don't get a pushback there. I am not OK with introducing what looks like a silent miscompilation. > > Joerg Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
