I've made the implementation of Type.__eq__ more robust and added tests. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Gregory Szorc <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The implementation could probably be a bit more robust (looking for > > None, comparing types, etc). Do we care? > > Regarding looking for None: what happens if one calls t == None on a > Type? Perhaps add a test? > > Cheers, > /Manuel > > > > --- > > bindings/python/clang/cindex.py | 10 ++++++++++ > > bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_type.py | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-commits mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > >
0002-clang.py-Implement-Type.__eq__-and-Type.__ne__.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
