On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don't know if it is an anathema to include '#' in the warning name. I'm > fine > with changing it, but this was the most obvious name. > I'd personally like to avoid usual characters in warning names. The '+'s we have already cause shell confusion enough, # seems risky... -Wimport-directive-pedantic? -Wimport-preprocessor-directive-pedantic? Or we could just be lame and use "-Whash-import-pedantic" but I feel like a more descriptive name should be available to distinguish the various forms of this. Maybe others on the list have better ideas.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
