I'm fine with -Wimport-preprocessor-direct-pedantic. I'll go and change it.
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't know if it is an anathema to include '#' in the warning name. I'm fine > with changing it, but this was the most obvious name. > > I'd personally like to avoid usual characters in warning names. The '+'s we > have already cause shell confusion enough, # seems risky... > > -Wimport-directive-pedantic? > -Wimport-preprocessor-directive-pedantic? > > Or we could just be lame and use "-Whash-import-pedantic" but I feel like a > more descriptive name should be available to distinguish the various forms of > this. > > Maybe others on the list have better ideas.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
