On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ahmed Charles <[email protected]> wrote: > qualified name) > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Has there been any consideration around having MS imply C++11? Given > that VC doesn't support modes for standard versions, it wouldn't > breaking users expectations as much as requiring that their code is > compatible with the most recent version of VC.
Yes that would make sense if we want to emulate the latest MSVC. (clang can't the MSVC 2010 standard header files without -std=c++11) I haven't pushed that because I always use -cc1 and explicitly pass the options I want. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
