On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Francois Pichet wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ahmed Charles <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> qualified name) >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>> >>> Has there been any consideration around having MS imply C++11? Given >>> that VC doesn't support modes for standard versions, it wouldn't >>> breaking users expectations as much as requiring that their code is >>> compatible with the most recent version of VC. >> >> >> Yes that would make sense if we want to emulate the latest MSVC. >> (clang can't the MSVC 2010 standard header files without -std=c++11) >> >> I haven't pushed that because I always use -cc1 and explicitly pass >> the options I want. > > > I'd be fine with ms-compatibility mode enabling C++11. There's no point in > trying to support older MSVC versions.
I think it's reasonable as well. ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
