On Jun 21, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Lang Hames <[email protected]> wrote: > Should this flag, whatever it's eventually called, have a "never-form" mode > that over-rides FP_CONTRACT and prevents any FMA formation? That seems like > it could be useful, if only for debugging. FP_CONTRACT doesn't guarantee any > fusing, so a flag that disabled any fusing wouldn't violate FP_CONTRACT > semantics, it would just provide a baseline with no fusing carried out. This > is what I had in mind when I penned the comments that you referred to Hal. > > In that case an alternative flag could be: > > "-fform-fma={anywhere,standard,never}"
Sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
