On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:56:02 -0700 Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> As this is largely unrelated to what names we choose to give things in > Clang's commandline interface... > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Hal Finkel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But the LLVM option is called enable-excess-fp-precision; I would > > like to have consistency across both LLVM and clang. > > > > I agree that this is a noble goal. The good news is that LLVM's > options are implementation details that we control and can change > freely. I don't really care what the internal option is called, as > long as the folks hacking on the code understand it, and it is > correctly used. =] It's also not a problem to start with a poor name > here and fix it later as we don't build up any legacy with it. My point is that we *just* changed the name a few days ago. Now is the prime time to change it in light of the present discussion. -Hal -- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
