On Jun 30, 2012, at 14:13 , Andy Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Part 6: This patch can now be treated totally in isolation and applied or > rejected separately of all the others. If you think a better solution must > be found than having a getCommentHandler method in DiagnosticConsumer, then > leave this patch out. It will not cause regressions to leave it out, and I > will look later at whether another solution presents itself. > > <verify-part6.diff> Not a fan. Why do we have to queue up the comments? Why not just parse comments as they come in? Jordan _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
