This seems like a very bad idea when I have this in a comment: <em>0<i</em>
If you expand the '<', you end up with invalid HTML. Entities are supposed to be entities when they come out the other end. Either Doxygen comments can contain HTML, or they can't. Please don't mix the two. On Jul 25, 2012, at 14:38 , Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > The attached patches implement resolving of HTML character references > (named: &, decimal: *, hex: ) during comment parsing. > With these patches in place, internal representation of plain text in > comment AST will not contain character references, but the characters > themselves. > > Dmitri > > -- > main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if > (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/ > <convert-unicode-code-point-to-utf8-v1.patch><character-references-v1.patch>_______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
