On Jul 25, 2012, at 14:54 , Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >> This seems like a very bad idea when I have this in a comment: >> >> <em>0<i</em> >> >> If you expand the '<', you end up with invalid HTML. Entities are >> supposed to be entities when they come out the other end. > > '<' will be expanded in the internal representation. HTML renderer > will escape HTML special characters back. …as long as my test case is emitted unchanged, I don't mind, but I think it's non-trivial to expand entities in "<em>0<i</em>" and keep track of which "<" are supposed to be escaped. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
