On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Sebastian Pop <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Ping^4.
> >
> > Hi, I'm waiting for a month now for an OK to commit.
> > It seems that really nobody except me cares for this change.
> > Does it really matter to somebody if I'm pushing this change out to svn?
> >
> > How should I proceed in timeout cases like this?
>
> Patch looks good, please go ahead and commit. If this happens again,
> please CC me. If I can't review the patch, I'll find someone who can. Sorry
> about that!


It's also largely my fault. I've been neglecting CMake patches. =/
Sebastian pinged me on IRC and I still didn't get to it.

FWIW, the first patch makes perfect sense.

The second patch I'm not as clear on... I feel like either:

1) We shouldn't build (or test) c-index-test and friends if they
necessitate a static library and that isn't supported in the CMake
configuration, or

2) We should link c-index-test and friends dynamically when explicitly
requested to do so.


I think I prefer #2. What do you think?
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to