On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Sebastian Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:31 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Sebastian Pop <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Ping^4. >>> > >>> > Hi, I'm waiting for a month now for an OK to commit. >>> > It seems that really nobody except me cares for this change. >>> > Does it really matter to somebody if I'm pushing this change out to svn? >>> > >>> > How should I proceed in timeout cases like this? >>> >>> Patch looks good, please go ahead and commit. If this happens again, >>> please CC me. If I can't review the patch, I'll find someone who can. Sorry >>> about that! >> >> >> It's also largely my fault. I've been neglecting CMake patches. =/ Sebastian >> pinged me on IRC and I still didn't get to it. >> >> FWIW, the first patch makes perfect sense. > > Thanks, committed as r161504.
Reverted as it broke some build bots. I will investigate and send back an updated patch. Sebastian -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
