On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Jordan Rose wrote: > What is the unexpected behavior? Or what will it not do that I would expect > it to do? (I forget what __private_extern__ is actually for.) > > On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:42 , Fariborz Jahanian <[email protected]> wrote:
Depending on __private_extern__ decl. being in header file or main file, visibility attribute may or may not show up in the generated code (and it may not be a tentative definition). See the radar for why Nick thinks this warning is needed to get us out of the jam for this gcc compatible behavior. - fariborz
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
