> Note: > Two patches associated with this commit, first for llvm, second for clang. > The clang patch > 0002-Add-configuration-of-CLANG_VENDOR-VENDOR_GCC_VERISON.patch > depends on the llvm patch > 0001-Add-configuration-of-CLANG_VENDOR-VENDOR_GCC_VERISON.patch
Changing the gcc version in only some places is strange. It would still define __GNUC_MINOR__ to be 2 for example. Some time ago Chandler convinced me that we should keep pretending to be 4.2 and ask users to check for clang directly when they want to detect if a new feature is supported. Is there a reason why you need clang to claim to be another version of gcc? Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
