On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Rafael Espíndola
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 14:41, ronl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Our productizing of llvm+clang is named and branded as hexagon-clang.
>> We are producing a hexagon targeted compiler which does not rely on GNU libc.
>> The product engineers did not want the output of -dumpversion to be 4.2.1 
>> for our product,
>> as this would imply some degree of compatibility with GNU libc.
>> This change provides us with a mechanism to rebrand and change/enhance the 
>> product name,
>> as well as emit a different sequence of digits for  -dumpversion.
>
> So the intention is to not advertise it as gcc at all? In that can,
> what about VENDOR_VERISON instead of VENDOR_GCC_VERISON?

s/VERISON/VERSION/g

I also find that VENDOR_VERSION is a better name.

Thanks,
Sebastian
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to