On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 August 2012 14:41, ronl <[email protected]> wrote: >> Our productizing of llvm+clang is named and branded as hexagon-clang. >> We are producing a hexagon targeted compiler which does not rely on GNU libc. >> The product engineers did not want the output of -dumpversion to be 4.2.1 >> for our product, >> as this would imply some degree of compatibility with GNU libc. >> This change provides us with a mechanism to rebrand and change/enhance the >> product name, >> as well as emit a different sequence of digits for -dumpversion. > > So the intention is to not advertise it as gcc at all? In that can, > what about VENDOR_VERISON instead of VENDOR_GCC_VERISON?
s/VERISON/VERSION/g I also find that VENDOR_VERSION is a better name. Thanks, Sebastian -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
