Yes, my first statement was incorrect. Still, these option don't help, because they (a) change the default target triple and sysroot of the resulting compiler, which may be undesirable, and (b) only let us build one flavour of compiler-rt anyway (just a different one this time).
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Those define the host platform (i.e. the one where compiler runs). The >> idea here is to build compiler-rt for all possible target platforms. > > Actually that's what a sysroot is, it's the target headers and > libraries for a given target OS. > The difference is when you decide to use it also as the host libraries > and headers as well, > that's still a host cross host compiler (i.e. cross compiler) it just > may not seem that it is. > > I agree with the motivation completely, just need to figure out a way > to get it to happen. > > -eric _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
