Not particularly happy about it, but it seems like it'll be fine for now if it unblocks some progress you'd like to make.
-eric On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <[email protected]> wrote: > ping > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov > <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK, let's get rid of the configure option for the sake of progress. >> Please take another look. >> This way android runtime can be built with an extra make invocation in >> the same build tree. >> make -C tools/clang/runtime/ >> LLVM_ANDROID_TOOLCHAIN_DIR=/path/to/ndk/toolchain >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Otherwise I think it starts to become an unwieldy set of configure flags >>>> to set any sdk/sysroot that any particular target triple needs in building >>>> any of the runtime libraries (libcxx will necessarily have this problem >>>> too). >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>> >>> FWIW Jim, Chandler and I have been discussing this as well. Been going >>> over how to deal with in versus out of tree builds and options for a full >>> toolchain. Just wanted to let you know it's more than just a couple of >>> people chatting :) >>> >>> -eric _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
