On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Diego Novillo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +Diego,David >> > >> > And if/when we add MemorySanitizer, can we add new alias >> -fmemory-sanitizer? >> > I am asking because we are in the process of committing asan/tsan to >> gcc, >> > and we want to preserve consistency between clang and gcc. Gcc uses >> > -address/thread-sanitizer. >> >> I agree with Chandler. Using compatible flags in both compiler is >> going to be the best option for users. I only ask that we don't start >> changing these flags every so often (unless there is a very good >> reason for doing so). >> > > > So what naming scheme do we choose as main? > If it's -sanitizer=xxx, then gcc must be changed. > > > Just to make sure everyone is on the same basis, Richard's proposal is to have the flag be `-fsanitize` => Note the leading `f` and the absence of trailing `r`. -- Matthieu
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
