On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Kostya Serebryany <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> >>> Just so we have something specific to talk about, here are some options: >>> >>> 1) For the 3.2 release, we remove the existing switches. >>> 2) For the 3.2 release, we keep the existing switches, and produce a >>> deprecation warning if they are used. At some point between 3.2 and >>> 3.3, once you think most of your users have transitioned, we remove >>> the aliases. >>> 3) We keep the compatibility switches for the time being (and thus >>> probably forever). >>> >>> I think my preference is (2). >> >> I don't have a strong opinion here, both (2) and (3) sound reasonable. > > My preference is (2) as well, so let's go with that one.
OK, all done as of r167429. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
